The GOSPEL of THOMAS
Elucidation of the secret words
The TAO TE CHING of LAO TZU
 



About The Fall of man

Translation of a section from "Het is Mogelijk" (It is Possible), preliminary exercise and preparatory study for the Gospel of Thomas, www.mogelijk.info

Like all myths and fairy-tales there is a hidden message in the story of man's fall. It is not anyhow an apple of anyhow a tree, but explicitly is mentioned it was the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil. And Eva says to the serpent: "We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden; But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die". It says so not at all God did forbid that, but only if man would eat from it he would die, or put another way, he would expel himself from paradise. You can compare it with the fairy-tale of Snow-white. The dwarfs so enjoined upon her not to accept anything, for it could be dangerous, but she too yield to the temptation and the promise and had to pay dearly for that by falling asleep. Next fallen man needs a saviour, like a prince to Snow-white. And they awaked and lived still long and happily, but we are not as far as that.

In fact the Fall of Man is a very simple story with a same simple message and moreover it is the root of guilt and projection. You could read it as follows:

  • God (or Nature Spinoza would say) has decreed, by His eternal and unchangeable Laws of Nature, what for man is good and what is bad, for is own welfare, so he can live free, happy and unconcerned. Blessedness consists so in living according the will of God or according Nature (like the statement of Spinoza again) .To eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil merely means man starts decreeing arbitrary what is good and evil in his own conceit, to his own disaster.
  • The serpent seduces Eva to eat that apple and next she gives it to Adam.
  • And then both are called to account and at that moment happens what still happens everyday and everywhere: the one blames the other and the other blames the seduction and so they open the source of guilt. Both reject the responsibility for their own behaviour and opinionatedness and so they expel themselves out of their innocence and paradise and that they consider as the punishment for their trespass. But it wasn't a punishment, but only a warning to stop with that pride.
The cruelty of the myth of the Fall of Man is that it is represented as a irreversible process and that isn't it. Like Heraclite says: "the way up and the way down is the same" so the way out and the way in too. If the trespass of man is he decrees arbitrary what is good and evil, he can stop doing this too. Still one man decrees the other how to live. The doctor decrees what is wholesome and unwholesome for his patients, parents teach their kids what is good and evil in their opinion, clergy decrees what to believe and what not, scientists what is true and untrue, politicians what is good and bad for their citizens, trendsetters what is in and what is out, judicature what is justice and what is injustice, establishment what is normal and abnormal, psychiatrists who is mad and who is not, and so on and on. 

That is the way men prefer their own laws to the eternal and unchangeable Law of God, or Nature and everybody can decide for himself to stop with this pride. It is the pride of men they are convinced they know better than God and Nature and they have to make better nature.

About 400 AC Pelagius, a stranger from Ireland came to Rome. He rejected the fatalistic irreversible doctrine by the lickspittle of the establishment, Augustinus about the fall of man and the original sin. People sin, he said, by imitating and repeating the contravention of Adam. But like all threats for the men of power Pelagius was denounced and Pelagianism eradicated. 

In fact for the return to the Promised Land you only need the message of the Fall of Man. The rest of Bible is only the history of a wandering nation, culminating in the appearance of a messianistic movement, become known as "jesus", whose rise and fall are described metaphorically in the synoptic Gospels.